| Overall Rating |
 |
|
| Description |
| Daewoo's old small family range was replaced by the Kalos in 2002. Lanos makes little sense now as it's outdated and unrefined, although it is very cheap to buy. |
|
| Handling |
|
|
| Comfort |
|
|
| Quality & Reliability |
 |
|
| Performance |
|
|
| Roominess |
|
|
| Running Costs |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Stereo/Sat Nav |
 |
|
| NCAP |
|
| Best Models |
| 1.4 SE |
| Worst Models |
|
| Replacement |
| 2003 |
|
 |
| Road Test |
| In its day Lanos looked quite attractive, the best of the late 1990s Daewoo line-up and a big improvement on the ancient Nexia. But when rivals moved on, and budget family motorists began to expect more for their money, Lanos began to look too basic and was left behind. Quality and reliability are pretty good, and rust isn't usually a problem. Road, wind and engine noise are all higher than on modern cars. Fuel economy isn't good, emissions are poor, and insurance ratings are higher than average, so running costs are disappointing for a small car. The 1.4 litre engine feels sluggish; although its top speed is a respectable 102mph, it takes far too long to get there. The 1.6 accelerates quicker but is still uninspiring. You're buying basic wheels here, so best bargain buy is the 1.4 SE, which comes with fairly generous kit as standard. The higher priced versions aren't worth the extra. |
| Positive Points |
- Practical budget transport for smaller families
- Reliability is above-average; reasonably safe
- Cabin is quite comfortable for four adults
|
| Negative Points |
- Little image and an ageing design
- Engines are noisy when stretched
- Thirstier than most rivals; steep depreciation
|
|
Sign In | Sell My Car » 
